Software Architecture

Model–View–Presenter

Understanding the MVP architecture pattern for building testable, maintainable user interfaces.

🧩

What is Model-View-Presenter?

Model-View-Presenter (MVP) is a software architectural pattern that separates an application into three interconnected components: Model, View, and Presenter. It's designed to facilitate automated unit testing and improve separation of concerns.

The Presenter acts as the "middle-man" between Model and View, containing the presentation logic and coordinating updates between the two. Unlike MVC, the View in MVP is more passive and delegates all user events to the Presenter.

The Three Components

Model

Represents the data and business logic of the application. Contains the core functionality and data structures, independent of the user interface.

View

A passive interface that displays data and routes user commands to the Presenter. The View has no direct knowledge of the Model and contains minimal logic.

Presenter

Acts as the intermediary between Model and View. Contains presentation logic, retrieves data from the Model, formats it, and updates the View. Handles all user input from the View.

MVP vs MVC vs MVVM

Aspect MVP MVC MVVM
View Role Passive, delegates to Presenter Can observe Model directly Binds to ViewModel
Middle Layer Presenter Controller ViewModel
Coupling View ↔ Presenter (1:1) Loose coupling Via data binding
Testability High (Presenter testable) Medium High (ViewModel testable)

Benefits of MVP

  • Testability: Presenter logic can be unit tested without UI dependencies
  • Separation of Concerns: Clear boundaries between UI and business logic
  • Maintainability: Changes to UI don't require changes to business logic
  • Reusability: Presenters can be reused with different View implementations

When to Use MVP

Good For:

  • • Android development (traditional approach)
  • • Applications requiring high testability
  • • Complex UI logic that needs isolation
  • • Teams prioritizing unit testing

Consider Alternatives For:

  • • Simple CRUD applications
  • • Frameworks with strong data binding (use MVVM)
  • • Very small projects with minimal UI logic
  • • Real-time reactive applications

Looking for a Different MVP?

MVP has different meanings in other contexts: